Vous avez été redirigé vers la version locale de la page demandée

The quality of hops and hop pellets is vital across the entire brewing supply chain. Traditional methods used for quality control (e.g., titration and HPLC) are highly accurate and widely accepted. They are also time consuming, labor intensive, and dependent on chemical reagents which not only incur ongoing material costs but also require careful handling and proper disposal. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) offers a compelling alternative when ultra-high precision is not necessary. It enables the rapid analysis of multiple parameters within a minute without using any chemicals. This Application Note outlines the measurement setup and the results of cohumulone, hop oils, and moisture content, the hop storage index (HSI), and hops acids analysis with NIRS.

 

Figure 1. OMNIS NIR Analyzer Solid.

More than 500 fresh hop samples and ground hop pellets were analyzed on an OMNIS NIR Analyzer Solid (Figure 1). The samples were added to an OMNIS sample cup and analyzed in diffuse reflection mode. To include sample variety, the sample rotated during measurement to collect spectra from different locations. The automatically averaged spectra were used for model development. Spectra acquisition, model development, and validation were carried out with the OMNIS Software.

Reference values for alpha acids were obtained using various official methods, including EBC 7.4, EBC 7.5, and EBC 7.7. Total oils and beta acid content were determined using EBC 7.4, while EBC 7.7 was employed for cohumulone analysis. Moisture content and the hop storage index (HSI) were measured using a halogen moisture analyzer and a UV-VIS photometer, respectively.

The obtained NIR spectra (Figure 2) were used to create prediction models for the different reference parameters. An external validation set was used to verify the predictive performance of the calculated prediction models if sufficient samples were available. Otherwise an internal cross-validation was conducted.

Correlation diagrams which display the relation between the NIR prediction and the reference values are shown in Figures 3–12 together with the respective figures of merit (FOM). For the alpha acid parameter with reference data obtained according to EBC 7.5, a model was created covering the full range (2.40–21.74%). Furthermore, a model for only the lower range (2.43–4.26%) was created to highlight the possibility of reducing the prediction error by creating sub-models for narrower concentration ranges. 

Figure 2. Overlaid NIR spectra of ground hop pellet samples. Data was obtained with an OMNIS NIR Analyzer Solid. Blue spectra were used to calibrate the model, while green spectra have been used for validation.

Result alpha acid (EBC 7.4) in fresh hops

Figure 3. Correlation diagram and the respective FOMs for the prediction of alpha acid content in hops following the EBC 7.4 norm using an OMNIS NIR Analyzer Solid. Blue dots represent calibration samples.

Result alpha acid (EBC 7.5) in fresh hops

Figure 4. Correlation diagram and the respective FOMs for the prediction of alpha acid content in fresh hops following the EBC 7.5 norm using an OMNIS NIR Analyzer Solid. Blue dots represent calibration samples, green dots represent samples used to validate the model.

Result alpha acid (EBC 7.7) in fresh hops

Figure 5. Correlation diagram and the respective FOMs for the prediction of alpha acid content in fresh hops following the EBC 7.7 norm using an OMNIS NIR Analyzer Solid. Blue dots represent calibration samples, green dots represent samples used to validate the model.

Result cohumulone in fresh hops

Figure 6. Correlation diagram and the respective FOMs for the prediction of cohumulone content in fresh hops following the EBC 7.7 norm using an OMNIS NIR Analyzer Solid. Blue dots represent calibration samples, green dots represent samples used to validate the model.

Result alpha acid (EBC 7.5) in ground hop pellets – full concentration range

Figure 7. Correlation diagram and the respective FOMs for the prediction of alpha acid content in ground hop pellets following the EBC 7.5 norm using an OMNIS NIR Analyzer Solid over the full concentration range (2.40–21.74%). Blue dots represent calibration samples, green dots represent samples used to validate the model.

Result alpha acid (EBC 7.5) in ground hop pellets – lower concentration range

Figure 8. Correlation diagram and the respective FOMs for the prediction of alpha acid content in ground hop pellets following the EBC 7.5 norm using an OMNIS NIR Analyzer Solid over a lower concentration range (2.43–4.26%). Blue dots represent calibration samples.

Result beta acid in ground hop pellets

Figure 9. Correlation diagram and the respective FOMs for the prediction of beta acid content in ground hop pellets following the EBC 7.4 norm using an OMNIS NIR Analyzer Solid. Blue dots represent calibration samples.

Result total oil content in ground hop pellets

Figure 10. Correlation diagram and the respective FOMs for the prediction of total oil content in ground hop pellets following the EBC 7.4 norm using an OMNIS NIR Analyzer Solid. Blue dots represent calibration samples.

Result HSI in ground hop pellets

Figure 11. Correlation diagram and the respective FOMs for the prediction of hop storage index in ground hop pellets using an OMNIS NIR Analyzer Solid. Blue dots represent calibration samples. Reference values were obtained with a UV-VIS photometer.

Result moisture in ground hop pellets

Figure 12. Correlation diagram and the respective FOMs for the prediction of moisture in ground hop pellets using an OMNIS NIR Analyzer Solid. Blue dots represent calibration samples. Reference values were obtained with a halogen moisture analyzer.

This Application Note demonstrates the feasibility of using NIR spectroscopy for the analysis of freshly harvested hops and ground hop pellets to determine cohumulone, moisture, and total oil content, HSI, and alpha and beta acids.

Using alpha acids as an example, the difference between a prediction model covering the full concentration range and a model specific to a narrower range was highlighted. The latter reduced the prediction error by a factor of two. Users can apply this approach to maximize accuracy. In the OMNIS Software, both models can be combined to automatically perform the following sequence. First, the alpha acid concentration is estimated using the broad-range model; then, a more precise prediction is made using the restricted-range model.

Since NIRS measurements are rapid and require no chemicals, the method offers significant time- and cost-savings, as shown in Table 1.

Furthermore, the simplicity of the analysis and the availability of a pre-calibrated instrument, using the pre-calibration, hops, solid (6.06008.022), make both the implementation and the application of NIR spectroscopy with OMNIS NIRS straightforward.

Table 1. Overview of time effort and costs for the analysis of different parameters in hops by traditional methods and NIR spectroscopy.
Parameter Method Estimated time
(with sample preparation)
Estimated costs
(chemicals, consumables)
Alpha acids Titration 50 min $5
Beta acids HPLC 25 min $10
Cohumulone HPLC (part of beta acid analysis) (part of beta acid analysis)
Total oil content Steam distillation 190 min $5
HSI UV-VIS 45 min $5
Moisture Halogen drier 7 min $0
All parameters NIR spectroscopy 2 min $0
Contact

Metrohm Suisse SA

Industriestrasse 13
4800 Zofingen

Contact