You have been redirected to your local version of the requested page

Mercaptans are organic sulfur compounds with the general formula R–SH. They naturally occur in crude oil and cannot be effectively removed through the distillation process [1,2]. Elevated concentrations of mercaptans are corrosive and can reduce the thermal stability of fuels, leading to problems with engine health, performance, and increased pollution. Consequently, ASTM D1655 sets the maximum allowable concentration of mercaptans in jet fuel at 30 mg/L (ppm) [3].

Mercaptans are Raman active and at high concentrations they can be identified and quantified by analyzing their Raman spectra. However, the trace amounts of mercaptans found in fuels are generally below the limit of detection (LOD) of standard Raman spectroscopy. To overcome this limitation, Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) can be employed, which significantly enhances the Raman signal and enables the detection and quantification of mercaptans at trace levels.

Standard methods such as potentiometric titration (ASTM D3227), ultraviolet fluorescence (ASTM D5453), gas chromatography (GC), and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) are used to quantify low concentrations of mercaptans. However, these methods are time consuming and costly, require skilled personnel that can perform complex procedures, and generate chemical waste. Conversely, Raman spectroscopy is an easy to use, cost-effective analytical technique with quick results. 

SERS (Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering) is ideal for trace materials below the LOD of traditional Raman spectroscopy, such as mercaptans found in fuels. SERS amplifies the Raman signal of molecules bound to nanoparticles through electromagnetic field enhancement generated from the excitation laser-nanoparticle interaction. This enhanced signal exceeds the sensitivity of standard Raman techniques and enables rapid identification and quantification of trace amounts of chemicals.

Additionally, SERS requires minimal training, it uses very small sample volumes (typically less than 20 μL), and it improves safety by minimizing exposure risks and waste disposal concerns.

Figure 1. SERS is easily implemented on any 785 nm Raman instrument with dedicated substrates. Metrohm’s MIRA XTR and P-SERS substrates are a convenient, portable, and sensitive solution.

Methyl mercaptan (MM; 2,000 mg/L in toluene) was serially diluted with paraffin oil. Dilute samples (5 μL) were applied to Metrohm’s silver paper SERS (Ag P-SERS) substrates and allowed to rest for five minutes. After resting, SERS data was collected with MIRA XTR (Figure 1). Experiment samples and conditions are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Samples and experimental conditions for the SERS determination of trace MM in fuels.
Instrument MIRA XTR
Software Vision
Calibration Samples Conc. 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00 mg/L (ppm)
Method Laser:
Time:
Averages:
100% (~50 mW)
1 sec
10
Validation Samples Conc. 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00 mg/L (ppm)
Method Laser:
Time:
Averages:
100% (~50 mW)
1 sec
3
Figure 2. Raman spectra of a) the MM standard and paraffin oil, b) Ag P-SERS substrates with 0.00 and 100.00 mg/L (ppm) MM, and c) Ag P-SERS substrates with 0.00, 0.05, 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 mg/L (ppm) mercaptan.

The Raman spectrum of the MM standard solution only displays peaks attributed to toluene, the solvent matrix. No mercaptan-specific peaks are observed, indicating that a concentration of 2,000 mg/L (ppm) is too low for detection by standard Raman spectroscopy (Figure 2a). However, after analysis with Ag P-SERS, the Raman band at 675 cm⁻¹ associated with S–C stretching becomes detectable even at 100 ppm (Figure 2b) and was observable down to 0.05 ppm (50 ppb; Figure 2c). This result suggests that SERS enables the detection of mercaptan at trace levels significantly below the ASTM limit of 30 ppm [3].

A calibration curve for low-concentration MM was developed and validated against samples measured by different data collection methods (Figure 3). With an R2 of 0.975, the model effectively captures the relationship between peak intensity and concentration. The model’s PRESS (predicted residual error sum of squares) value of 0.0632 is high in order to distinguish subtle concentration changes between 0.00 and 0.05 ppm (50 ppb) but is sufficient for differentiating samples with increments of >0.05 ~ 0.10 ppm. The calibration model predicts the concentration of validation sets with good accuracy, achieving an R2 of 0.962 and a PRESS value of 0.053. The validation curve was adjusted for bias and slope using Vision software, optimizing sample validation. These results confirm that MIRA XTR, coupled with Ag P-SERS substrates, can be effective for quantitative analysis of low-concentration MM.

Figure 3 Calibration and Validation curves of MM across the concentration range of 0.00–1.00 mg/L (ppm).

A calibration curve plateau above 1 ppm (data not shown) suggests that the adsorption efficiency of MM on the Ag substrate declines at higher concentrations. This, combined with the low detection limit, indicates a high affinity of mercaptans for the Ag P-SERS substrate. Thus, dilution may be required to accurately quantify higher mercaptan concentrations, such as fuels containing 30 ppm mercaptans.

Coupling MIRA XTR with Ag P-SERS substrates permits detection of trace mercaptan concentrations down to 0.05 ppm (50 ppb). This very low detection limit exceeds that of traditional methods and enables detection of mercaptan concentrations well below the ASTM standard [3]. A simple, fast analysis with SERS provides a safe, efficient, and highly sensitive solution for mercaptan analysis in complex fuel matrices.

  1.  Carroll, J. J. Natural Gas Hydrates: A Guide for Engineers; Gulf Professional Pub., 2003.
  2. Shale Oil and Gas Handbook; 2016.
  3. D1655 Standard Specification for Aviation Turbine Fuels. https://www.astm.org/d1655-22.html (accessed 2025-02-03).
Contact

Metrohm India

Annai Indira Nagar, Thoraipakkam
600097 Chennai

Contact